Hello,
some impact categories, such as Goods produced by forced labour follow an evaluation schema of only two risk levels:
0 = no risk:
1 = very high risk
However, there are elementary flows for all risk levels available:
Flow Category Factor Unit Uncertainty Location
Goods produced by forced labour; high risk Social flows/Workers/Forced labour 10.0 GF med risk hours/h none
Goods produced by forced labour; low risk Social flows/Workers/Forced labour 0.1 GF med risk hours/h none
Goods produced by forced labour; medium risk Social flows/Workers/Forced labour 1.0 GF med risk hours/h none
Goods produced by forced labour; no data Social flows/Workers/Forced labour 0.1 GF med risk hours/h none
Goods produced by forced labour; no risk Social flows/Workers/Forced labour 0.0 GF med risk hours/h none
Goods produced by forced labour; very high risk Social flows/Workers/Forced labour 100.0 GF med risk hours/h none
Goods produced by forced labour; very low risk Social flows/Workers/Forced labour 0.01 GF med risk hours/h none
Is there a specific reason why all elementary flows are provided?
I assume in the processes only high risk and no risk are allocated?
I am worried that due to the provision of all elementary flows & if these are manually allocated, it could lead to wrong results and misinterpretation of the indicator's result.
Happy to get some feedback on these thoughts.
Kind regards,
Madeleine Pries
Kind rega
