0 votes
75 views

Dear community,

I have recently played around with Analysis Groups to investigate the hotspots of a separation process. It is modelled as a waste treatment process. 

I use openLCA 2.5.0 and ecoinvent cut-off UPR 3.11

As an input, I use Elecricity, water and steel. Here the steel represents the cutting edges, which are regularly changed. Because I have two cutting edge components, i originally have two inputs of the same material: 

You can also see the assigneg analysis groups. For this product system i get corrupted results for the analysis groups with a large rest.

However, if i adapt the process and sum up the steel inputs into one flow the results are caculated correctly.

My main motivation to post this is that I am seeking for a deeper understanding of the function "analysis groups". Can you explain to me why the results come out this way? Is there some documentation on the algorithm behind it? I personally love the functionality, but I dont really feel capable of correctly implementing it in a consistent manner. 

Thanks,

Paul

ago in openLCA by (680 points)
edited ago by

2 Answers

0 votes
ago by (141k points)

Hi Paul, from what you post, I do not see the analysis groups? Also, what do you mean by 

i get corrupted results for the analysis groups with a large rest

Your process is a waste treatment proces, and you have two times the same product inputs from the same process which is a bit a special case. I will check if the analysis groups cannot handle that, could be.

Thank you!

Andreas 

ago by (680 points)
Hi Andreas,
thanks for your answer.
 I will edit the original post to show my analysis group calculations.

The analysis groups are also visible in the processes of the product system before the ::

By corrupted results I mean that there should not be any rest, because all processes are assigned to a analyisis group, however there is a large rest.
ago by (141k points)
thank you - so we checked and it is indeed a bug, linking the same process twice in a process does not work. We will fix this in a next release.
ago by (680 points)
Interesting - thank you for having a look!
cheers,
Paul
0 votes
ago by (480 points)
ago by (680 points)
Thanks for that - I read this already a few times - it is helpful but doesnt really explain how it works with complex product systems and loops :)
...