0 votes
20 views

Hi,

I've recently ordered Exiobase 3.8 through Nexus and was just comparing some of the factors with Climatiq to ensure comparability before going any further with the project, using the product database.

In Climatiq (see screenshot) the carbon impact is 0.1097 kgCO2e/eur. 

When I run the same process in OpenLCA (admittedly with a 10^-6 cut off to manage memory), I get a value of 0.0619 kgCO2e/eur with IPCC2021, so just over half.

I note that the monetary is listed as "EUR 2000" in OpenLCA. I presume that as the dataset is from 2019, that "EUR 2000" is not a baseline of Euro value in the year 2000? There are no notes to that end in Exiobase 3.8.2 OpenLCA document.

Is it known why there is such a difference? Does it trace back to the inclusion (or not in OpenLCA) of land use change?

Thanks,

Chris

ago in openLCA by (240 points)
edited ago by
ago by (240 points)
Hi Conrad - yes I saw that previous query and that the databases were not the same. In this case, I am looking at the same databases - 3.8.2 in both circumstances.

I haven't tried to adjust for inflation or convert currencies beyond normalising the factor down to impact per euro.


Do you have any other suggestions for the large difference? For example, I cannot see any breakdown of biogenic carbon sources in OpenLCA while Climatiq expressly mentions land use is included. I have uploaded the impact analysis tab screenshot in the original message above.

1 Answer

0 votes
ago by (125k points)
Hi Chris, what is the process / sector in openLCA? Country is UK, I see. Thank you. I can try a full calculation then, a 1E-6 cutoff can have an influence. Thank you!
ago by (240 points)
Hi Andreas - thank you for the offer.

The process I started with (although there will be others) is Renting services of machinery and equipment without operator and of personal and household goods (71) in the UK.

Thanks for your help in advance.
...