0 votes
1k views
Dear Andreas, Michael, GreenDelta,

Congratulations on the new version of openLCA 1.6 and also updating the Monte Carlo feature. I can now confirm that the negative results previously encountered with openLCA 1.3/1.4/1.5 are no longer there.

I do have twp separate questions and they pertain to the sampling approach used in openLCA for its MC function:

(1) Can the sampling approach in openLCA be summarized as "partially independent" sampling as is clarified in Suh and Qin 2017? (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-017-1287-x)

(2) Is it possible to isolate sampling only for the foreground processes? (i.e. turning off all upstream sampling)

All the best,

Michael
asked by

1 Answer

0 votes
answered by (41.4k points)
 
Best answer
Hi Michael,

thank you for the congrats!

To your questions:
-> 1) We perform the simulation in openLCA in a way that would be classified as "fully dependent" in the article you mention: all uncertain data is drawn at the same time, and then a calculation is started. If a process appears in several "branches" of a supply chain several times, uncertain data is drawn for this process only once and then used in the calculation.
-> 2)"is it possible to isolate sampling only for the foreground processes? (i.e. turning off all upstream sampling)": unfortunately not but I agree this would be a nice feature.

Best wishes,
Andreas
commented by
Dear Andreas,

Thanks for the reply.

So, the final mean and standard deviation for each impact category are reported as arithmetic means and standard deviations, correct?

This is problematic for skewed data, no? For instance, if the histogram of 10,000 MC outputs follows a log-normal best fit, it would be incorrect to report the impacts with an arithmetic mean and standard deviation.

Best,

Michael
commented by (41.4k points)
well,
"This is problematic for skewed data"
I agree, this is a common issue in data analysis, the mean is sensitive to outliers (or, asymetric distributions more generally) and therefore it makes sense to also calculate the median, which we do. It is also possible in openLCA to export all simulation data and perform more analyses, e.g. related to an assumed distribution, with this data. I do not think, though, that there is a right or wrong, correct or incorrect, here, as often in data analysis, but of course the arithmetical mean is not perfect, as other indicators too.
Cheers
Andreas
commented by
Dear Andreas,

Correct, I have already exported all the data and made the appropriate estimations of the log-transformed data.

For me, I was just curious whether openLCA might include an option to automatically report log-transformed statistics, given that inventory data and thus results may commonly follow log-normal distributions? No need to respond to that, just a suggested-feature to add from a dedicated user :)

All the best,

Michael
ask.openLCA is a question-and-answer (Q&A) website on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and also the public (User2User) support platform for openLCA, openLCA Nexus, data.openLCA and the LCA Collaboration Server.

Learn how it works or browse through our archived forum.

Receive guaranteed and prioritised professional support via GreenDelta's HelpDesk.

To report a bug, please create a new issue on GitHub or ask a question here with the bug tag.

ask.openLCA is run by GreenDelta, the creators of openLCA.
openLCA

LCA Collaboration Server
...