+2 votes
Hi, I'm doing a social assessment for agriculture using PSILCA version, but my results for 'Industrial water depletion' seem weird. I'm comparing 1 dollar agricultural output in Belgium, Germany and Spain, and the characterization factors used represent a very high risk for Belgium and Germany, and a medium and low risk for Spain. Comparing to AWARE CFs, Belgium and Germany have no problem with water scarcity, unlike Spain, that has high CFs for agri, non-agri and default factors. I also checked the main source of the values, and they show different results from PSILCA indicator. So, what I would like to ask is, is there a different explanation for the impact category or the risks are wrong in the database?
in Miscellaneous by (180 points)

1 Answer

0 votes
by (180 points)
Sorry to bother about this.I'm writing a manuscript and this answer is really important on it.