Dear OpenLCA team,
I would appreciate to hear your thoughts regarding the implementation of EF 2.0 in your impact category set "EF method (adapted)", water use to be more precise.
The characterization factor for subregions (e.g. RER, RNA, etc.) were set to the world average (42.95), while they actually have their own CFs (see the spreadsheet available here
http://wulca-waterlca.org/aware.html). Was this not implemented as in the original source because it was taken from source for EF 2.0 characterization factors provided by the EU commission?
